The other day on a writers' listserve the question was asked: Does a writer really need an author photo for the jacket of his/her book? As I recall, the poser of the question (no pun intended) was reluctant to provide her publisher with a photo--either out of modesty or privacy concerns, not because she had two heads or something. I didn't participate in the discussion because, frankly, my immediate thought was, “Yes, of course an author needs a photo!” It wasn't until I thought about it later, though, that I wondered if that were really true.
I have bought hundreds of books without knowing or caring what the author looked like. I tend to buy books based on reviews, and the occasional recommendation of a friend with similar tastes to mine. Unless it’s a self-help book (Lose ten pounds and ten years!) what the author looks like seems hugely irrelevant.
Having picked up a book while bookstore browsing, I will probably idly flip to the photo on the back. I don't recall ever buying a book on the basis of the photo, however. I may have been turned off if I'm wavering over the purchase and the author looks just a tad too pleased with him/herself, or certifiable, or vaguely illiterate.
I had a lot of fun with author photos in my second book, Death and the Lit Chick, so I may just be asking for it here in asking you to help me decide on mine. But my new editor has asked for a black-and-white for my first book in a new series, and I'm just plain tired of the color photo I've been using. (What was I thinking, with the pearls, anyway? Yikes!) This time, I didn’t want to go for a studio portrait. I just wanted to be, well, myself, wearing pretty much what I wear when I write. No pearls.
This posing business is all much trickier than it appears. First requirement, I would say, is that the author somehow look like a writer rather than a professional ice skater, for example. Many authors fulfill this need by holding a pen or sitting at a computer, although I would maintain that holding a Starbucks cup would be more authentic. Second, the photo should be appropriate for the type of writing the person does--a children's author should probably not scowl, for example. A thriller writer should look thrilling.
And again, while the photo may not cause someone to buy a novel, it should not actively discourage a sale, either. This is someone in whose company you’re going to be spending at least a few hours, after all.
Here are the results of my “photo shoot.” Please cast your vote for 1, 2, 3, or 4 below.
23 comments:
I'm fond of close-ups, but I think you look very pretty in all of them, and the background is great. But I vote for the close-up shot.
The second one, closer with the trees. Very good.
I vote for the close-up, too. I like the background with the tree limbs and the expression on your face.
Definitely go with the trees background. The brick wall reminds me too much of a mug shot background for some reason. Although...given that you write mysteries, that might not be such a bad idea.
And BTW, I have a sneaking suspicion that only other authors and would-be authors bother looking at author photos or reading dedications and acknowledgements in books. I can't remember ever doing so until I started writing. It would be an interesting exercise to go into a bookstore and poll the customers about this.
My vote goes for the close-up, too.
I agree, the second one.
The only author photo I recall noticing was John Grisham's, and he did look pretty pleased, for good reason, no doubt.
I would go with the first one, but crop it, so you only have the wall behind you.
They're all good, though
I like the second one. Your smile is warm and the background is lovely.
The 2nd one! But they're all good. :)
Close-up; trees. If you want, we can do some more when you're here next week - lots of trees, and/or maybe a fireplace? There is always that picture of you and you-know-who with the rose. . . . [grin]
Queenie - was that the one where he had the rose between his teeth? Oh, my. Possibly not the sophisticated look I was aiming for ;-)
Number two, with tree.
Where is Cecil Beaton when you need him? Anyway, unlike anyone else so far, I cast my vote for #3. Good luck.
Call me a "traditionalist" but I like to see author's photos. It may not close the sale, but it makes me feel like there was actually a real person behind the writing.
I like #3 best.
The second one, Gin.
Yeah, the close up.
I kind of prefer 2 (close-up) or 3, myself. My husband prefers 3. But I might just say to hell with it and email them Tasha Alexander's photo.
I like #3 -- feels casual and smart. The close-up is great, but I find the background a bit busy.
Gin - you have the more natural smile in #2 and #4 (more warm and friendly). Hopefully you'll crop whichever shot you go with (the crossed arms are a bit off-putting).
Good luck with the decision!
Another vote for the trees. And your smile is indeed lovely.
I love photo number two, but I write that as someone who looked like Dorothy Hamill in her first author photo. So much for not looking like professional skaters.
I like number 2.
And BTW, I always like more natural shots than studio portraits! Makes an author seem more accessible, somehow.
The second one is looking like the winner, hands down. Sorry there's no prize ;-) But thanks to you all for your input. Much appreciated.
Post a Comment