I
was watching The Girl the other night
and something Hitchcock said to Tippi Hedren has stuck with me. I can’t stop
thinking about, even days later, and how it plays to the vanity of Hitchcock
(specifically) and writers (in general).
In
the scene where Tippi (played by Sienna
Miller) and Hitchcock (played by Toby Jones) discuss her character’s motivation
for going into the attic alone, knowing there would be birds there, (they were
filming The Birds at the time). Tippi asked, “Why would Melanie go into that
attic all alone?”
Hitchcock
replied, “Because I want her to.”
Because I want her to.
While
a cinematic genius like Hitchcock might be able to get away with that, for a lowly
novelist like me, writing takes a bit more work. Just because I want my characters to do something, doesn’t
mean I should make them do it. There has to be a reason my characters do and say the things they do and it's my job to give them that reason.
It's called motivation.
Motivation
is what a writer weaves throughout a plot to bind it tight. Motivation is what
makes even the implausible seem possible. Even the most unlikely seem
inevitable. But what is it? A traumatic past? Money? Love? Revenge?
I
can’t simply decide I want my protagonist to rob a bank or rescue a bunch of
kids from a burning orphanage. There has to be a trigger that sets them on the
course. Are they days away from losing their home to foreclosure? Is their
child in need of a lifesaving operation and the insurance company refuses to
pay. Did they lose a loved one to a fire? Did they grow up in an orphanage
themselves?
These
are seeds from which future action grow and if you want your novel to feel real,
they must be planted. From these seeds should sprout a chain of events, fed on
emotion and tended by circumstance, that will inevitably lead your
protagonist to a place where the life-altering decisions they make are the only
ones that make sense.
Look at it this way...
If
a novel is a vehicle, then motivation is the fuel in the tank. It makes us move
and takes us places. Maybe even places we never had any intention of going.
Places we don't want to be... places we have a hard time visiting. If there's no
gas in the tank, that vehicle isn't moving. But if you put the wrong kind of
fuel in the tank then your vehicle breaks down completely. It becomes an undriveable hunk of crap that noboby wants to drive. Or read.
When
Hitchcock sent his character into that attic full of live, pissed off birds, he
wasn’t sending the character—he was
sending Hedren. He allowed his personal motivation to color the
actions of his character… and in doing so, changed the movie completely.
It was no longer about the story itself at all. It was about Hitchcock’s desire
to punish Hedren for finding him repulsive. In punishing Hedren, Hitchcock gave us a peek behind the curtain. Even though we may not have known it at the time,
we saw a writer at work and that is something your reader should never see.
The
stories we write should be seamless. Our characters
should be fully formed, with their own set of experiences that give their
choices weight and purpose and the conclusion those choices lead them to should
seem inevitable.
Anything
less would be a cheat—to myself as a writer and to people I write for.
2 comments:
Maegan,
What a wonderful post ~ you've made an excellent point. I watched the movie twice (which was difficult to do; not b/c it wasn't well done; the story itself was upsetting) and that line bothered me, too. I was saddened to learn that one of my idols of movie making treated an actress so poorly (I don't know how she handled so many takes on that attic scene).
Motivation is absolutely a requirement; Kurt Vonnegut said it well: "Every character should want something, even if it is only a glass of water.”
I really like your analogy of the novel and a vehicle ~ well done!
Thanks, Kathleen!
Vonnegut is right--whatever it is, there should be something that drives us all.
Maegan
Post a Comment