I had this really great idea for a book.
I mean, scorching hot. My daughter and I had occasion to hang out at Denver
International Airport and we were struck by some bizarre and disturbing murals.
My daughter happened on a website that went into detail explaining a conspiracy
theory involving a One World Order group and bunkers below the airport to house
the world’s elite in the event of a nuclear holocaust.
I was off and running. Following
Internet rabbit holes revealed how extra-terrestrials or aliens from the center
of the earth had various plans for DIA. The runways created a Swastika, the
murals and other public art warned of biologic warfare. I gathered it all up,
plotting, planning, creating a story that wound Hopi legend and belief in Sky
People with DIA and stuff worthy of Trilateral Commission mythology.
I stuck Nora (the protagonist of the
Nora Abbott Series) in the middle and plopped it all in Moab, UT amid
polygamists and environmentalists. I’m telling you people, this was an amazing
plot.
According to my editor, it was too
amazing.
But, but, but…
She didn’t think it was a great idea to
use theories that could easily be debunked with a minimum of real research and
wondered if I might be opening myself up for lawsuits by claiming certain
far-fetched stories as truth.
I’d written the whole book with the
premise of Evil lurking at DIA as the central event. The entire plot was
formulated from the seed planted the day we wandered around the airport. I
began to examine the book with fresh eyes. If you didn’t know the starting
point was the bizarre and unsettling DIA weirdness, how would you see the plot?
What would be the most important elements?
There’s Nora, our protagonist and what
she’s gone through in the previous two books to bring her to this point. She’s
the executive director of an environmental non-profit. There’s her best friend,
the woman who is producing a documentary film to advocate for expanding the
borders of Canyonlands National Park in southern Utah. Nora’s mother, Abigail always
wants to butt in and the books all deal with Hopi tribal history and legends.
When I boiled it all down, I discovered
the DIA element was the least important in telling the story I had in mind. I
pulled it out without disrupting an already crowded story line.
Other writers understand the way stories
develop and morph from first idea to published book. I find it’s good to stay
flexible, able to bend the original idea. If you’re like me and get stuck with
a questionable premise, it’s great to unfold it and smooth out the crinkles to
fold again.
The non-writers in my life are driven to
drink (yes, they’d probably drink anyway) by this nutso process. I discuss
plots with my favorite guy over cocktails in the hot tub. He’s often more
vested in the original idea than I am and gets frustrated when I say casually,
“Not anymore. I changed that.”
Eventually the books get made, messy
process notwithstanding. What about you, what’s the best idea that you never
wrote?
BTW- Tattered Legacy (without the DIA plotline) is available March 8th.
No comments:
Post a Comment