I decided to talk about rules today. I hate them! I have
never been one to follow them, so why start now? I remember when I penned my
first book, SHATTERED DREAMS, a million years ago. At the time I thought I was
a romance writer and SD is a great woman in jeopardy romance if I have to say so myself. I
still cry when I think about certain scenes. You can imagine my surprise when
it started getting dinged in contests by judges who felt compelled to tell me I
was not playing by the rules. Guess the fact that I had 2 male heroes in the
story, one of whom doesn’t meet up with the heroine until the middle of the
book drove them nuts.
Crap! To change the story to fit the rules would have ruined
the story. My heroine gets kidnapped and smuggled into Colombia where she eventually fights
with her captors against a powerful cartel. Enter guns, dead bodies and explosions.
“Romances don’t have those sort of things,” I was told. Well
crap, again. Usually in contests, I would get two people who loved the story,
and one who absolutely hated it because I broke the rules. Rejection comments
from professionals included, “You can’t have a romance in a Third-World
country,” and “You can’t have two heroes,” etc.
To this day I can still remember the way I felt when my agent
called and said, “I love this story.” Unfortunately, she couldn’t sell it, either,
for the very same reasons. But I thought it should have some readers, so I put
it up myself a few weeks ago. (Shortened the title to SHATTERED.)
Anyway, it made me
think of my aversion to rules. My Berkley
editor was always reminding me that I was writing “un-cozy-like.” I called her
the cozy police. She was right, of course, but it didn’t seem to change the way
I think when I write. I like big stories with lots of action, bad words and
humorous sarcasm. So, I still try to slip a few ‘uncozy” things in.
Terri, on the other hand, loves my sarcastic potty mouth and
wants more. HEARD IT THROUGH THE GRAPEVINE, my new series, is considered
soft-boiled, and therefore I have more leeway. I’m anxious to see the response
to it.
Back to the point of this blog…rules. Recently, I ran across
this list from Kurt Vonnegut about writing fiction. I agree with most of them,
but even if I didn’t I write mysteries, I would totally disagree with the last
one. Read them and let me know what you think. And BTW, I am anxiously looking forward
to meeting al the wonderful MI authors at Malice this year.
Eight rules for writing fiction:
Use the time of a total stranger in such a way that he or
she will not feel the time was wasted.
Give the reader at least one character he or she can root
for.
3. Every character should want something, even if it is only
a glass of water.
4. Every sentence must do one of two things — reveal
character or advance the action.
5. Start as close to the end as possible.
6. Be a sadist. No matter how sweet and innocent your
leading characters, make awful things happen to them — in order that the reader
may see what they are made of.
7. Write to please just one person. If you open a window and
make love to the world, so to speak, your story will get pneumonia.
8. Give your readers as much information as possible as soon
as possible. To heck with suspense. Readers should have such complete
understanding of what is going on, where and why, that they could finish the
story themselves, should cockroaches eat the last few pages.
- Vonnegut, Kurt Vonnegut, Bagombo Snuff Box: Uncollected
Short Fiction (New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons 1999), 9-10.
6 comments:
I agree to disagree with the last rule. Excuse me...WHY do I need to finish the book (or movie, or anything) IF I have all the information to finish the story. Come on writers...KEEP ME GUESSING what's going to happen and 'who dun it'. I don't want to know in the beginning and love it when I guess incorrectly (as long as the writer has laid down all the clues).
~Angi
My thoughts, exactly. Of course, you and I both write suspense!! Hey, Angi, thanks for commenting. I was feeling all alone over here.
Loved this post, Liz! And "sarcastic potty mouth lover" Terri is a gem. My RM Outdoor Adventures MI series is soft-boiled, too, so I can get away with some foreplay, more violence, etc, than I can in my cozy MI series.
As for Vonnegut's rules, I would modify #5 to say "start when the protagonist's life changes forever." Also, I don't agree with #8 either. I think you need to keep planting unaswered questions to pull the reader through the story.
Good points, Beth. I have one of your books on my kindle. Now to only find the time to read it!!!!
I am a little nervous about the bad language because Lois mentioned once that readers griped at her for a few cuss words. But both Terri and Courtney assure me that it's okay. And I'm also a little nervous that although they said it would be marketed as soft boiled, it is on the website as a cozy. It is SO not a cozy.
Hi Liz - my series is soft-boiled too, and I'm glad we can wave that banner. I look forward to your book. As for the rule...I disagree that every sentence has to do one of those two things. Sentences can sometimes establish setting, which is crucial for avoiding the white box syndrome. See you at Malice!
Looking forward to it, Kathleen. And I agree with everything you said. Thanks for commenting.
Post a Comment