Monday, October 11, 2010

Interview with Reed Farrel Coleman


Reed Farrel Coleman has been called a hard-boiled poet by NPR’s Maureen Corrigan and the noir poet laureate in the Huffington Press. He’s published eleven novels—two under his pen name Tony Spinosa—in three series, and the stand-alone Tower co-written with award-winning Irish author Ken Bruen. He’s won the Shamus Award for Best Novel of the Year three times, has won the Barry and Anthony, and twice been nominated for the Edgar Award. He is a co-editor of The Lineup and was the editor of the anthology Hard Boiled Brooklyn. You can reach Reed on his website, Facebook, or Twitter.

Reed is one of my favorite authors and it is quite a thrill to interview him for the blog.

Q: The sixth book in the Moe Prager series, INNOCENT MONSTER, was released October 5th. With the continued success of the series, have the expectations—of your publisher, of readers, of yourself—changed? Do you feel more pressure now to deliver a certain kind of novel? Was INNOCENT MONSTER easier or harder to write than the first five?IM_FNL_06

RFC: Oddly, I feel much less pressure than I used to. Writing Moe is  like hanging out with an old friend. It’s easy and relaxed. Because I know Moe so well, I can go along for the ride. I know how he’ll react to any given situation and I know how I can make it entertaining. INNOCENT MONSTER was pretty easy to write— relatively speaking—because the basics of the plot just popped into my head once I had the title. I had a lot of fun with this one.

Q: The plots in your books are great, but what adds depth and emotional resonance throughout the series are Moe’s personal struggles. Did you map out these book-to-book-to-book character developments ahead of time?

WalkingPerfectSquare RFC: I don’t do any mapping at all, I’m thrilled to say. What makes it fun for me and, by extension, the reader, is that it’s immediate. What comes to my mind as I’m writing goes directly down on the page. It’s fresh to me, so I hope it’s just as fresh for the reader. Even when I was writing WALKING THE PERFECT SQUARE, the first book in the series, and I laid out part of the series arc, I did it because it occurred to me as I was writing it, not because it was part of some grand scheme. I think Moe’s struggles resonate, because they are resonating to me at the very moment I’m writing the words.

Q: I love wise-guy/angst-ridden PIs, like those written by masters of the genre Robert Crais, Robert B. Parker, Michael Connelly, and Dennis Lehane. To me, your Moe Prager books fit right in (and it’s not just my opinion, you’ve won the Shamus award three times, and been nominated for multiple Edgar and Macavity awards!). Who are some of your writing role models/influences? What living writer would you want to be stuck in an elevator with?

RFC: Last part first. I’ve been very fortunate to meet most of the people I admire in the mystery writing community. When I was the executive VP of MWA, I served with Janet Evanovich, Linda Fairstein, Lisa Scottoline, Charlaine Harris ... I’ve met Nelson DeMille and Stephen King. I’ve done signings with Michael Connelly. I’ve had some interesting conversations with Lee Child. I’ve written a book with Ken Bruen. They’re all pretty fascinating people, but if I were stuck on an elevator, I think I’d like to be stuck there with SJ Rozan, Daniel Woodrell, Philip Kerr, and Peter Spiegelman. As far as influences on my writing, I’d say Chandler and Hammett, of course, but the biggest influence on the Moe books was Lawrence Block, hands down.

Q: You’re an adjunct professor at Hofstra University, teaching writing. If you could go back thirty years (give or take!) and have yourself as a student, what lessons would Reed the Instructor be sure Reed the Student mastered?

RFC: Harden your heart against the hardships because there’s nothing you can do to prevent them, and keep doing what you’re doing.

Q: You co-wrote the critically-acclaimed novel TOWER with Ken Bruen. Could you describe the process? Was it easier or harder than writing solo? In what ways?

tower RFC: The process was like water-boarding, only worse. Not that I don’t love Ken. I do. It’s just that he did this Zen thing with me. He sent me half the book and then left it up to me to figure out how to do my half and make it work. We never discussed how to do it. It was like I had to find my way to be the other hand in the one hand clapping metaphor. It nearly killed me, but it made me such a better writer because it was so hard. Much much harder than writing solo.

Q: A few years ago, you served as the Executive Vice President of Mystery Writers of America (MWA). You also teach, appear at conferences, and promote your new releases. What’s your secret for balancing writing with all these other commitments?

RFC: Drugs.

Q: You’ve written both novels and short stories. Preference? Aside from the number of words, what’s the biggest difference between the two forms?

RFC: When I teach I describe the difference this way: A short story is like a road flare. It has to burn brightly and be intensely about one thing. A novel is like night sky, full of stars, some shining more brightly than others. Or, if you prefer, it’s like the difference between red and white wines. Red wines tend to be more complex and, depending upon grape variety and vintage, can change as they age. White wines are less complex and tend to be about one thing. Short stories and novels are different beasts and require different talents. Lately, I’ve been pretty enamored of short stories. SoulPatch

Q: Which of your books is your favorite? Why?

RFC: REDEMPTION STREET and SOUL PATCH are tied. They both hit very close to home emotionally.

Q: What can we expect in the future? More Moe Prager? More Tony Spinosa-penned stories? Another stand-alone collaboration? A series about a wise-cracking, follicle-challenged guy from Brooklyn who likes to play basketball and is a hell of a writer?

RFC: I’m writing a new Moe book right now called HURT MACHINE. I don’t think there will be any new Tony Spinosa books, though there might be the occasional story out of him. I want to do a few more collaborations because TOWER was such a challenge and made me a better writer. A stand-alone of mine is being shopped now. I guess we’ll see.


Thanks, Reed, and best of luck with INNOCENT MONSTER.


Jessica Lourey said...

Thanks for visiting the blog, Reed! Great interview, you two. I'd like to point out that Reed is as charming in person as online, and it looks like he'll be coming to a bookstore near you this month:

Keith Raffel said...

Alan, great questions. Reed, terrific answers. I can hear your voice in my head with each one. See you later this week at Bouchercon.

Alice Loweecey said...

Great interview! Lots of pieces of wisdom to remember.

Beth Groundwater said...

Great interview, Reed and Alan!

I remember meeting Reed at the Left Coast Crime conference in Denver and finding him funny and personable. Okay, Reed, here's my question for you--what drugs??? ;-)

Darrell James said...

Great post Reed and Alan. I was there at Bouchercon when Reed won the Anthony. Great moment! Looking forward to more works from both of you.

Anonymous said...

Alan and Reed - Thanks for this very interesting interview!! Lots to digest :-)

Cricket McRae said...

Welcome to Inkspot, Reed! And terrific interview, guys. I'm so looking forward to reading Innocent Monster.
Hearth Cricket

Elizabeth Spann Craig said...

Thanks for coming by Inkspot, Reed! Best wishes for your new release. I'm looking forward to "Innocent Monster!"

Alan Orloff said...

Thanks, Reed, for the great interview. You're welcome back to any time! And thanks to the blog readers and commenters--if you haven't read any of Reed's books, put them on your TBR list. You won't be sorry!

Deborah Sharp said...

Ah-ha, so now I know the secret, thanks to Reed, to balancing all aspects of the crazy writer life: Drugs! Great interview, Alan (though I wish you'd pin him down on exactly what kind of drugs ;-)

Carol Grace said...

What fun for Alan to interview a favorite author and to introduce us to Reed. Very inspiring.